August 2010 – “Stand In The Door!”

by Fitzroy Mclean on September 2, 2010

Volume IV, Issue 8 / August 2010

Welcome Letter



Many years and many kilos ago I was a 20-year-old cadet at West Point. The summer between my second and third year I went to Airborne School. Airborne school should be called Parachute School but that would be far too self-explanatory. Airborne school, at Fort Benning Georgia, is where the Army teaches young men and women how to fall out of airplanes in an orderly manner. The school spends very little time explaining anything about parachuting because basic static line jumping requires very little of the jumper. The chute deploys automatically and you land mostly where the winds take you. In fact the majority of the three-week course is spent learning how to enter and exit the aircraft the Army way and how to land. I remember very little about Airborne school other than early morning runs and hours spent jumping off a six foot platform into a sawdust pit in the hot July sun. After three weeks ¨training¨ I fell out of the aircraft five times thereby proving that gravity works. It wasn’t a test of skill but rather courage. I can still remember my first jump. I didn´t sleep the night before. When the door opened and we all stood up, my heart was in my throat the entire time. And when the Jumpmaster pointed at me and commanded, ¨Stand in the door!¨, my first thought was that my mother would still love me if I sat back down. The rest was a blur. Airborne school was a rite of passage. Like every other newly minted paratrooper, I adopted the vernacular and swagger. Invariably whenever a group of us were ready to go somewhere; to a bar, to the library or to the gym, someone would yell out, ¨Stand in the Door!¨. Normal well-adjusted college kids would say, ¨Ok ready guys. Let´s go.¨ Not us. We were paratroopers. Man we thought we were so cool.

A couple of years later, as a young lieutenant, I went to ¨Jumpmaster School ¨ and started to understand a bit more about parachuting, selecting drop zones and rigging equipment. Mostly I spent my time learning how to check if a soldier had put on his parachute and other equipment correctly and to spot any potential safety hazards. By this time I had about 50 jumps and the outright fear of the first jump had been replaced by more of a stress-induced focus. The most important part of jumpmaster school was passing a test on the Jumpmaster Personnel Inspection or as it was called JMPI. It was a bit disturbing to think that my ability to catch a potentially fatal flaw could mean the difference between life and death for some mother’s son. After all I was not yet 25 years old. It seemed an awesome responsibility, which I took very seriously. With graduation from Jumpmaster School came even greater vernacular and swagger and the ability to point at someone else and scream, ¨Stand in the Door!¨

A few years later, I attended Military Freefall School also known as HALO (High Altitude Low Opening) school. This created an entire new level of complexity. Unlike static line parachuting, this required me to plan and think because I actually had control of the parachute and my actions or failure to act controlled my immediate destiny. Here is a video from my era which seems so low tech by today´s standards.

By the time I arrived in Yuma Arizona for the course I had over a hundred jumps and I had been the primary Jumpmaster many times. I was starting to get accustomed to the pressure and the process. By the second week, I was in the groove and while I learned quite a bit, the mystique was wearing off. We made jokes like, ¨Don´t worry if your chute doesn’t open, you have the rest of your life to deploy the reserve¨. There was a studied nonchalance that the instructors and students alike affected yet under the surface we were serious and truth be told still focused by fear. We no longer swaggered or told people to ¨Stand in the Door!,¨ because that was not cool. We were ¨special¨ and we shunned those who still talked in the vernacular of regular static line parachuting.

Trichet to Bernanke: “Did you pack your reserve?”

By the time I went to the free fall jumpmaster course, I had over 300 jumps. I looked at the course as a “check the box” exercise because by this time I thought I had ¨been there and done that¨. I still got butterflies before every jump but the process had become almost routine. My complacency lasted until after lunch the first day. The senior instructor took us into the classroom and proceeded to show us accident scene videos and photographs. Gruesome. Then he pointed out that of all the fatal free fall accidents since the military started keeping track of the data, over 85% involved jumpers with over two hundred jumps.
Was this just the odds catching up with the most active daredevils? No. The problem was jumpers became complacent about the danger. What was once extraordinary became routine. The focus gained through fear subsided. The dangers had not changed in any way but ¨old hands¨ no longer felt compelled to focus on them. Subconsciously, they ignored the dangers. They would cut corners. They would skip an important safety check. They ignore their altimeter and just estimate the altitude from experience. They daydream through the pre mission brief. Subconsciously we adopt the mentality that a lack of negative outcome in the past, in some way negates the increased risk. Kind of like a turkey the day before Thanksgiving. They ignore the perils and get away with it, which in turn reinforces their belief that the dangers are less than they are. Until one day…..

And this leads me to the point of this walk down memory lane. I am convinced the majority of market participants now feel they are ¨old hands¨. Many fund managers and individual investors have ¨Been there. Done that¨. Central bankers have defied death and lived to talk about it. They have been ignoring the obvious danger signals and getting away with it.

It seems as if every day there is more catastrophic market moving bad news that… well… doesn´t move the market. Housing starts at the lowest level ever… don´t sweat it. Unemployment still hovering around 10% officially… no big deal. Budget deficit increased by… who cares.

As I read about the goings on in Jackson Hole this past weekend I could not help but be reminded of the videos of fatal freefall accidents. Each and every one of the bureaucrats seemed to have adopted the idea that a lack of negative outcome somehow obviates the risk. But don´t worry when their main policy fails they will have the rest of their lives to deploy their reserves. ¨Stand in the Door!¨ It is a long way down and it is going to hurt.

This Month

This month we bring you part two of our coverage of Peru. Last month we talked about the public markets. This month we focus on the entrepreneurial and lifestyle opportunities in Peru with an emphasis on the Cusco area. Cusco is transitioning from solely a tourist destination to a resources boomtown. For the intrepid amongst us, Cusco could be a good place to set up camp.

We will then focus the remainder of the edition on why after a year of observation we think it is time to get busy with our vulture activities in the southern cone region of South America. We first brought up the idea a year ago but for a variety of reasons the timing has not been right until now. We will explain to you how we intend to go about investing in land and other real assets. We provide a way you can join us in this endeavor. We also offer up some ideas on how, if you have the time and resources, to give it a go on your own.

Upcoming Events

I´ll be in Cafayate for the upcoming event at Dough Casey´s La Estancia de Cafayate from the 20th to the 24th of October.

I´ll be speaking at the Freedom Fest cruise and conference in Buenos Aries on the 13th of November. Mark Skousen and the rest of the crew at Freedom Fest have put together a cruise that promises to be both interesting and enlightening. The details are still being firmed up but a trip around Cape Horn in a luxury cruise ship filled with like minded freedom seekers cannot be a bad experience.

If you have been contemplating a trip to this part of the world it would make sense to try to come down for one or both of these events. If there is enough interest we would be willing to put together a Without Borders get together between the two events. We could even combine it with a tour of some of our vulture opportunities. If you are interested please email admin@withoutborders.com

Yours in Exploration,

Fitzroy McLean
Chief Bon Vivant and Speculator

This post is just an excerpt from a full issue of Without Borders. If you would like to read the full article and gain exclusive access to all of the actionable investment intelligence that our current subscribers are profiting from every month, then we invite you to try out or subscription, risk-free, for 30 days. So, try it out today and discover a new world of undervalued opportunities – and a fresh new world perspective.

SUBSCRIBE NOW

{ 0 comments }

July 2010: Atahualpa’s Revenge

by Fitzroy Mclean on August 3, 2010

Volume IV, Issue 7/ July 2010

Welcome Letter


Welcome Back. It has been another busy month for Without Borders. I have been spending a lot of time in Peru where there is opportunity a plenty these days. From a pure lifestyle perspective, it is not an attractive option for me personally, despite its rich cultural and historic offerings. It is, however, a great place for aspiring entrepreneurs with more hustle than money. It is also an exciting place to invest and speculate. The country is simply awash in opportunities. Therefore, this month will be part one of a two part series on Peru. This month I will cover the politics and economics as well as its capital markets. Next month we will focus on the entrepreneurial opportunities in Lima and the city of Cusco.

But first, we take a detour. Before we get into our Peruvian discussion, lets talk about the state of the political economy, or Politiconomy as we like to call it, since there is no longer any real distinction between Politics and Economics.

As I have mentioned before, my wife was born and raised behind the iron curtain. Whereas, I may from time to time rant about the trend towards socialism as unprecedented or shocking, she merely views it as a return to the ¨normal¨ behavior of governments. When we first met I was a flag waving US Army Airborne Ranger celebrating our victory over communism. My conviction that a new era of freedom and democracy was upon us was so absolute that when my wife’s suspicion of all government rose to the surface, I would assume a pedantic tone and explain how she just had the misfortune of growing up under an oppressive regime that did not respect individual liberty or democracy.

My wife, being far wiser than I, would merely shake her head and say, “You can never really trust a government because governments attract the worst elements in society. Governments exist to protect those inside government”. I remember the distain and pity I felt for such thinking as I arrogantly explained that in America the system was created to limit government. Government in America is designed to be weak. I would extol the virtues of the US Constitution as I pointed out how it empowered the individual and not the collective. I would sanctimoniously point out that freedom of the press and freedom of speech would never allow the politicians and bureaucrats to lie to the people. I would invariably remind her how in the Eastern Bloc the State owned media would run stories about how people were starving in the streets in America and Western Europe and how they would broadcast lies about external threats to scare people into supporting government.

I would explain that information technology would set people free and that with information came the power that would never let governments fool their people again. I explained to her how in Western democracies opposing views keep the government in check and academia and the press would never tolerate the blatant distortion of facts to protect or further the agenda of those in power.

Imagine how silly I feel now.

As a general rule I don’t watch television. We don’t have television on our farm. Most television shows are just bubble gum for the brain. But just the other day I was in the conference room of a major bank in Lima. I was early so they ushered me into the wood and flat paneled room where our meeting would take place. As the receptionist poured coffee I noticed one TV was tuned to CNBC and the other to Bloomberg. On screen number one an advisor to President Obama was spinning like a whirling Dervish dancer as he tried to explain away the most recent housing data. On the other screen the CEO of a bailed out bank was extolling the strength of the recovery despite the record number of unemployed. CNBC then had a terrorism “expert” on to discuss the latest threats and Bloomberg switched to the implications of state run healthcare. I was struck by how little pretense existed and that the segments were little more than propaganda. One shill after another spouted the script designed to affect public sentiment and the financial markets. I felt like the guy who lived along the border between East and West Berlin who watched the newscast about the poverty and violence in the West while just outside the window and across the DMZ relative peace and prosperity was there for the viewing. It was almost surreal.

As more coffee arrived I thought about those early conversations with my wife. I long ago came around to her way of thinking on government. A life spent in small wars and in and around politics will do that. As will a better understanding of economics. Yet I am still shocked by the way the American government has been able to co-opt the masses with such ease. Just think about it for a minute. Economic Central Planning. Media Subjugation. Free Healthcare. Government owned corporations run by the workers. A constant external threat. Blatant and Brilliant. It sounds very Socialist but it is not.

In America the difference is that the powerful elite are not political party members but rather the banking and industrial elite who have managed to usher in a regulatory system which made them the majority partner with government in the running of the State.

This is not Socialism. Socialism is a system where the State owns and controls the means of economic production. The system today is a variant of Fascism. Fascism is the system whereby the State directs the economic activity of privately owned industry. Today’s system in the west is not true Fascism because in true Fascism the balance of power lies with the State yet in today’s system the balance lies with the largest corporations. Besides, you can’t use the word Fascism without evoking images of jackbooted racists.

Ron Paul and others have started calling today’s system Corporatism. They define Corporatism as a system where businesses are nominally in private hands, but are in fact controlled by the government. In a corporatist state, officialdom acts in collusion with their favored business interests to design polices that give those interests a monopoly position, to the detriment of both competitors and consumers. But this is only one part of the entitlement driven system that eventually destroys all democracies.

I don’t like the term Corporatism because it implies that somehow corporations in general are a negative force. And corporations and Capitalism are so closely linked that the name will only confuse the already ignorant and malleable masses. It is not corporations that are bad. It is an environment, which allows for political influence to manifest itself through regulation that has caused many of today’s problems. We need to rally against the regulatory bodies that distort markets by creating barriers to entry and stifle innovation and competition.

Regulatory bodies are mostly faceless and unaccountable. The heads of regulatory agencies don’t have to stand for election. Bureaucrats who are mostly clock punching functionaries, incapable of understanding their cog or the overall machine, staff these agencies. These agencies are expensive and wasteful. They are a literally a tax on society. Without exception, these agencies could be reduced by more than three quarters or eliminated entirely. Most of the functions these agencies perform could and would be provided by the private sector in a way that would not use force to ensure compliance. Yet, although my Libertarian philosophy detests the waste and inefficiency of these agencies it is their contribution to the abdication of personal responsibility that is more bothersome.

The global politiconomic system is on the verge of collapse in no small part because of these agencies. They are the main distributors of unwarranted largess in the form of handouts and subsidies. It was foolish to believe that government could legislate and regulate the business cycle, just ask China and Russia, who are now trying to roll with it, instead of subdue it. It is more foolish to think that government, through regulatory bodies staffed by people who wear short sleeved shirts with a tie, could assume the responsibly of hundreds of millions of people. Yet this is the mentality of the masses;

  • I don’t have to think about what I eat. I pay my taxes. The Department of Health and the Food and Drug Administration are there so I can assume that if it is legal it must also be safe to ingest.
  • I don’t have to think about educating my kids. I pay taxes. The Department of Education will ensure the education is extemporary.
  • I don’t have to think about my retirement. I pay taxes. I have Social Security and a 401K in an SEC regulated mutual fund.
  • I don’t have to worry about the strength of the currency. I pay taxes. The Department of the Treasury and the FED do that.
  • I don’t have to worry about what happens to the poor in the community. I pay taxes. The Department of Housing and Urban Development and the Department of Labor will deal with that.

The list goes on and the argument is fundamentally flawed for no other reason than the majority of voters do not pay taxes. The mere idea that the government replaces the need to be responsible for one’s own life and community is disturbing on many levels beyond the financial costs of these agencies.

And when it comes to corporate responsibility the abdication is much worse. Banks and big businesses would have you believe that it was the “system” that broke down. It was not their decisions that were flawed. After all, the SEC, the Federal Reserve, the Department of the Treasury, the FDIC, numerous congressional committees and countless other local and state regulatory agencies were aware of what was going on and they did not see the crisis coming. Greenspan and Bernanke told everyone there was nothing to worry about so they were not really required to ensure their balance sheet was in good shape.

But beyond the cost of these agencies and their contribution to the abdication of personal responsibility, what bothers me most about these agencies is the barriers to progress they present.

The cost of regulatory compliance is the single largest barrier to entry for small innovative companies in any regulated industry. According to the Office of Management and Budget, a never to be trusted lackey of the executive branch, federal regulatory compliance costs American manufacturers $380 Billion per year and the regulatory compliance costs are “disproportionately burdensome for businesses with less than 500 million in annual revenue”. Large companies lobby Washington for more regulation not less. It is a misnomer that Drug companies want less involvement from the FDA. The FDA is what keeps small innovative companies from entering the market. Airlines routinely lobby for more regulation, as do the largest Banks. They just lobby for the type of regulation that reduces competition and favors institutions with economies of scale. That is why the recent financial bill was fought tooth and nail; because it would have reduced barriers for smaller more nimble firms.

It’s no wonder that the area where the economy has grown and entrepreneurship has flourished is in unregulated industries. The cause of the crisis was not too little regulation, it was the assumption that existing regulation allowed for the abdication of personal or corporate responsibility. Regulation is a crutch and a barrier to entry. The solution is less government regulation.

The Tea Party folks, though mostly well intentioned, are doing all of us a disservice by calling Obama a Socialist. He is not. The debate should promote the understanding that for many years there has not been a free-market in the US. Don’t let the financial crisis be in any way tied to the free market. Since government controls the private sector through taxes, regulations, and subsidies, and has done so for decades it is folly to say that Free Market Capitalism was at the heart of the crisis. If you must enter the debate then focus on the nexus of big corporations and big government regulatory agencies. Don´t allow the disastrous results of decades of government growth and regulated industry influence to be ascribed incorrectly to free market capitalism or used as a justification for more government expansion. If you choose not to enter the debate there is always room for new freedom fighters in Fitzroy McLeanistan.

There endeth the rage against the machine. Now we proceed to the Peruvian frontier where greener entrepreneurial pastures await.

In This Edition

While in Peru we looked at all types of investments, but certainly the extractive industries dominate the landscape. A couple months ago Carlos Andres of the Frontier Research Report brought to your attention a junior gold company operating in Peru that is now trading 30% higher than when he first recommended it. This month we bring you a large producing mining company with a bright future. As we will explain in the Actionable Intelligence portion of the letter there are several market events converging that will create a once in a decade buying opportunity. We will also talk a bit about Brazil and what we learned from a recent trip about the Politiconomy and how it affects your portfolio.

And as I look at the clock and the calendar I now admit to myself and you, dear subscriber, that my horrid work habits have once again made a looming deadline all but fanciful. To that end let me close this Welcome Letter with a ditty that just hit my inbox. A cigar smoking and scotch swilling friend, subscriber, plastic surgeon, and intellectual adventurer extraordinaire we call Doc penned it;

Tonga Awaits

Waiting here in Tonga,
We’re running out of light.
Without Borders has a deadline
That’s getting mighty tight.
Fitz is banging at the keyboard.
His Mac’s a smokin’, too.
All he wants now
Is to get this damn thing through.
The natives are getting restless and
The cauldron is stoked to boil.
The Editor doubles his efforts
As the drums begin to beat.
He hits the send key at the last second
And avoids being the tribe’s cooked meat.

- Doc

That my friends is the work of a true Renisance Man. Doc is a bon vivant welcome at my humidor or liquor cabinet any time and anywhere.

Yours in Exploration,

Fitzroy McLean
Chief Bon Vivant and Speculator

This post is just an excerpt from a full issue of Without Borders. If you would like to read the full article and gain exclusive access to all of the actionable investment intelligence that our current subscribers are profiting from every month, then we invite you to try out or subscription, risk-free, for 30 days. So, try it out today and discover a new world of undervalued opportunities – and a fresh new world perspective.

SUBSCRIBE NOW

{ 0 comments }

June 2010: Russia – Run Like a Scalded Dog!

July 1, 2010

Volume IV, Issue 6/ June 2010 Welcome Letter Welcome back. I could have sworn there were 31 days this month. Did they change that recently? This month has flown by. Literally and figuratively. As loyal readers know, I subscribe to the ethos ¨If you wait until the last minute, it only takes a minute¨, hence [...]

Read the full article →

May 2010: Rage Against The Machine

May 31, 2010

Volume IV, Issue 5/ May 2010 Welcome Letter Welcome back. This month I’m on the road again in Peru and Bolivia. I am writing you from the Bolivian city of Santa Cruz, where I had drinks with one of the rebel leaders of the separatist movement. The ‘rebels’ are desperate to remove the resource rich [...]

Read the full article →

April 2010 – Turkey At The Crossroads

May 4, 2010

Volume IV, Issue 4/ April 2010 Welcome Letter Welcome back!  We are excited to bring you Turkey as our focus this month. This historic and pivotally placed land plays an extremely important role and will increase in influence with the increase of trade barriers. Under such conditions, trading blocs will form and Turkey will become [...]

Read the full article →

March 2010 – Back to Africa

March 30, 2010

Volume IV, Issue 3/ March 2010 Welcome Letter Back to Africa This month we are writing from West Africa. Ghana to be precise. Let’s start off by getting our bias on the table. I really want to like Africa. Each time I go back, I board the plane, normally in Europe, with enhanced expectations. After [...]

Read the full article →

February 2010 – Social Science Fiction

February 28, 2010

Volume IV, Issue 2/ February 2010 Welcome Letter Social Science Fiction Fitz here. I just returned from spot checking the Uruguayan health system with my eight year old son who has tonsils the size of golf balls. I am very happy to report our satisfaction with the care and attention this relatively minor ailment received [...]

Read the full article →

The Intellectual Adventurer

February 2, 2010

The Intellectual Adventurer is always on expedition.   The first journey is one not of miles, kilometers, fathoms or farthings but of attitude, mentality and philosophy.  Our adventurer is one who views the world through a global lens.  His paradigm is not based on his hometown, state, province or country. It is based on his personal [...]

Read the full article →

January 2010: Is The Inevitable Imminent?

January 31, 2010

Volume IV, Issue 1/ January 2010 Welcome Letter Sometimes it is hard to juggle the travel in search of unique and profitable lifestyle, investment and speculating opportunities with the ever looming end of the month deadline. The fact that I am rather unorganized and subscribe to the theory ¨If you wait to the last minute, it [...]

Read the full article →

December 2009 – Trees Don’t Grow To The Sky

December 30, 2009

Volume III, Issue 12 / December 2009 Welcome Letter The other night I was at the grand opening of one of the trendy new bar restaurants in La Barra. It was an eclectic crowd. We encountered a European countess freely chatting with a local electrician turned jazz musician. In another corner the former CEO of [...]

Read the full article →